Skip to content
UAVSUPER

Field workflows / Construction

Construction progress capture that teams can compare

A recurring site record is useful when the field and office teams can find the same area, understand the date and compare the right views.

At a glance
  • Choose one recurring project review.
  • Keep area names and method changes visible.
  • Test the record with two visits and the actual reader.

Define the review the record supports

A superintendent comparing work areas, a project manager preparing an owner update and a coordination team checking a model need different outputs. Decide which review the recurring flight will support first.

For a visual update, stable viewpoints may be more useful than a complex model. For a drawing overlay, reference and completeness matter. For model coordination, confirm the receiving file format and the parts of the site that must be captured.

Capture should support a recurring review.
  1. 01VisitNamed area + date
  2. 02CompareStable coverage + references
  3. 03ActProject review + assigned issue
Workflow overview

Keep repeat visits comparable

Use consistent area names, visit dates and capture coverage. Record major route or camera changes beside the new visit. If an area is missed because access or site activity changed, label it instead of presenting the visit as complete.

Store outputs where the project team already works. A folder with unexplained exports creates more review work; a dated site record linked to known areas is easier to use during a meeting.

Choose the delivery format

ReviewUseful formatCheck before scaling
Owner or team progress updateDated photographs with named areasCan another person find the same location next month?
Site drawing comparisonReferenced orthomosaicDo coordinates, units and extent match the drawing?
Model coordinationReviewed 3D output in the accepted formatCan the coordinator open and align the export?

Select capture hardware from the recurring job

Matrice 4E is an integrated photographic mapping option. A P1 setup is the modular photographic path. Review a Dock only when the site can support recurring installed operation.

Start with two visits and one actual review meeting. Ask what the team could compare and what required extra explanation. Fix area references and distribution before adding more frequent capture or additional hardware.

Sources

  1. DroneDeploy: The Site Visit with Bartlett Cocke (opens in a new tab)DroneDeploy
  2. DJI Matrice 4 Series (opens in a new tab)DJI
Apply this readingProgress Monitoring

Related reading

All resources