- Keep the original and matched visual context.
- Record settings and relevant conditions.
- Make every observation identifiable to another person.
What a complete finding contains
Imagine receiving a red-and-yellow thermal screenshot with no asset name. You can see a difference, but you cannot reliably locate the component, reconstruct the observation or assign work. An inspection record should answer those questions without a phone call to the pilot.
Begin with a context photograph, a matched thermal observation, an asset identifier and a timestamp. Add the operating information requested by the reviewer. Keep the original file when the workflow needs measurement data.
- 01ObserveThermal + matched visual
- 02IdentifyAsset + location + time
- 03ReviewInterpretation + follow-up
Keep capture differences visible
Record the settings used to display and interpret the thermal image. A changed palette, range or viewing angle can change the visual impression. For recurring work, agree a repeatable capture method with the reviewer and document deviations.
A bright patch is an observation requiring interpretation. Assign that interpretation to the appropriate inspection specialist. The pilot’s job is to collect an identifiable record, including visual evidence that can help resolve an apparent anomaly.
Use a repeatable finding record
| Field | Example of what to record |
|---|---|
| Asset | Site / equipment / component identifier. |
| Observation | Location, time, direction and a short description. |
| Files | Thermal original plus matched context and detail images. |
| Conditions | Relevant operating conditions and capture settings. |
| Review | Reviewer, interpretation, follow-up and unresolved questions. |
Choose the camera around deployment
Matrice 4T is the integrated portable thermal starting point in this store. H30T is a payload selection for a supported modular aircraft. Compare them around transport, setup and the inspection record the team needs.
Run one complete sample finding before making a fleet decision. Give it to the person who normally reviews the inspection. Their questions will tell you what is missing from the capture and whether the proposed kit fits the reporting process.